Monday, April 4, 2016

Discussion: Paradise Lost, A Documentary About the West Memphis Three




After twenty-some odd years have gone by since the case came to national attention, the murders of the three little boys in West Memphis Arkansas has almost faded into obscurity. But at the time of the murders, I was a young mother, deeply sensitized to the topic of children, and shocked that something so horrifying had happened so close to home. When I first saw the three men accused of the crimes, I remember thinking of Damien Echols as a cocky little wise ass, scoffing at the lawyers, the police officers, the press, and figuring himself far too sophisticated to be concerned with the hillbilly soap opera playing out around him. Since I've gotten older, I look back at those clips of him schlepping into the courtroom with the bad Prince Valiant haircut and wide, bored eyes, and think, "he was just a kid himself."

In the years that ensued, I watched each successive documentary that one filmmaker after another cranked out about the trial and all of its players. "Paradise Lost," then "Paradise Lost: Revelations," then finally, "Paradise Lost: Purgatory." When I thought that was the end of it, another surfaced called "West of Memphis." In the first two documentaries of the original trilogy, Mark Byers, the stepfather of one of the murdered boys, raved and ranted in a forest clearing, bellowing out plans for the demise of all three of the young men accused. His anger certainly matched the viciousness of the attacks on the three children, and illustrated, beyond a doubt, of the "eye-for-an-eye" religious mentality of the community in the little village of West Memphis, AR. Meanwhile, attorneys eager for a career-boosting victory, showboated and swaggered, a man with a mail-order Ph.D. in "Occult Studies" gave testimony based on information presumably gathered from reading sensationalist novels and tabloids in the local checkout aisle. A child with an I.Q. of 75 was berated for hours by police officers who planted confessions in the boy until the boy himself grew too weary resist and confessed to playing a role in a crime he didn't fully understand. His attorney tells the story of Jessie Misskelley pointing to the word "Satan" written on a slip of paper and asking, "What is satin?"

There was no material evidence that linked these teenagers to the murder of Stevie Branch, Michael Moore, and Chris Byers. All they had were rumors, hearsay, and the assumption of guilt for a boy in a black trench coat and a notebook full of symbols representing nothing more than typical, adolescent curiosity in beliefs other than the fundamentalism he'd been inculcated with since birth. Then a smug police detective is at a press conference. When a journalist asks, him, on a "scale of one to ten, how sure are you that you have the right men?" Gitchell stopped jawing his gum long enough to say, '"leven.'"
"The West Memphis Three" L-R: Jessie Misskelly, Damien Echols, and Jason Baldwin

 I was embarrassed to be a Memphian. Even though this circus was playing out on the other side of the bridge, I could hear the nation laughing. For the last several decades, the South has been regarded as the cradle of ignorance, and this event, with all its players, had cemented that image in the nation's imagination permanently. Then, Damien Echols is elevated as the sacrificial lamb. Hollywood, the music industry, and every prominent member of left-wing society flocked to Arkansas in support of the "West Memphis Three." However, the center of their focus was always Echols. While they bleated and moaned over the injustice that had been wrought, Jessie and Jason suddenly began to fade into the background. While they denounced the fact that the legal forces at work had made Damien their scapegoat, the real murderer got away--and three little boys were dead.

Yet, while Damien is steadily achieving celebrity status with the help of the Dixie Chicks, Eddie Vedder, Johnny Depp, Hank Rollins and Margaret Cho--and a nonprofit group that rushed to his aid, the murderer is still out there, and three little boys are dead. The very fact of their deaths eclipsed by the efforts to secure the freedom of one young man.
                                Damien Echols (www.spin.com)

I have since changed my attitude (some) about Echols. I heard him admit that his actions in the courtroom twenty odd years ago were inappropriate, arrogant, and self-annihilating. He's grown into a rather well-spoken, respectable man with a wife and a new life in NYC. I am actually glad--or at least feel some satisfaction and forgiveness for the guy, and I never believed he was guilty of anything other than childish arrogance. Still. Three little boys are dead. Three little boys who would, had they lived, been in their thirties now with families, careers, homes in manicured cul-de-sacs and two-car garages, if it hadn't been for someone evil who walks free to this day.

Your thoughts?

11 comments:

  1. West Memphis Three
    It was interesting to see this movie again, and yes, Hollywood has made many sequels and interpretation of this story. I was also a young mother when the story broke; I think all parents kept a much closer eye on where their children were, and who they were playing with. If memory serves, this horrific act on the three young boys was at a time when Hollywood was producing a lot of demonic type of movies. Gothic, witchcraft, satanic ritual, mutilation and abuse of children was on the movie screens and the news nationwide.
    I feel that Damien’s attitude, and persona played directed into the frame of mind of the citizen, media and lawyers. Whether he was guilty or not, I personally think he was, and it might be for the same reasons they were convicted. The ways they acted, talk, and that you can’t touch me attitude, which was projected especially by Damien. As for Jason I think, he felt as though, he and Damien were friends and that meant until the end. Damien probably was the only friend he had and Damien mentions this in one of the interviews. I can’t shake the feeling that Damien was responsible for the mutilation and that Misskelly and Echols just helped with the killing. I may be far into left field, but they were never proven innocent. They were freed after entering a rarely used plea, which maintained their innocent but acknowledges the prosecutor had evidence to convict. The final judge sentencing was time served for the 18 years and imposed 10 years suspended sentence, instead of death penalty for Echols and life sentences for Misskelly and Baldwin. This was said to be a win, win situation for West Memphis and the boys, saving the city the expense of a retrial.
    Although West Memphis is right across the bridge, I personally don’t feel it impacts me, nor do I think it has a negative connotation on Memphis. Memphians do a good job of staying in the media for the crimes and heinous act imposed on the local citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, the West Memphis Three, something that has creeped in and out of the headlines nationwide for decades now. Three “men” convicted for killing three boys. Even though these “men” (Damien Echols, Jesse Misskelley, and Jason Baldwin) were children themselves. No one will truly know what happened to the three boys (Chris Byers, Michael Moore, and Stevie Branch) because no one truly knows what happens during a crime unless one is there. But there is no doubt that these poor boys were brutally murdered for reasons unknown.
    A lot of people don’t know unless they do there research but there was a bit of an epidemic going on in America at the time of the murders. This epidemic was called Satanic Panic. Which from watching the documentary in class, and other movies and facts about the case I can’t help but connect the two. In sociology, Satanic Panic is defined as a phenomenon characterized by widespread fear about the presence of Satanic ritual abuse in one's community, state or country. This “panic” began in 1970’s, continued into the 1990’s, and dwelled in the early 2000s. The FBI even had case files on Satanic Ritual Abuse of people reporting such occurrences but it all amounted to nothing because there was never any true evidence.
    I think this epidemic, this panic, was a perfect fuel to feed the fire in The West Memphis Three case files. Pinpoint some odd teens that dress gothic and may read up on some odd subjects and the law thinks oh they must be Devil worshipers this makes perfect since that they did this crime. The fact that the three “men” that were accused of the crime right away has many wondering if the true killer was ever caught. Did the law and community caught the wrong killer due to Satanic Panic or were these “men” actually performing Satanic Ritual Abuse on the boys?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am so glad you brought up the Satanic Panic issue. I recall very well how it became an epidemic on talk shows (particularly Phil Donahue, Sally Jessie Raphael, and others). As a minor observation, I found it humorous that they homed in on Damien's little sketchbook and the topic of Alistair Crowley--who was NOT a Satanist, though very close to being one--and missed the topic of Anton LaVey, founder and high priest of the Church of Satan.

      Delete
  3. It's weird thinking that those men, the Memphis Three, where in jail longer than I've been alive. Technology has changed so much and they have missed out on 20 years of progress in society. Then I think about the 3 boys that are gone, it's sad that their lives were over before they reach their teens. This whole situation is pretty sad; if you think about it, 6 boys lost their life. The three little boys life was stolen by a cold hearted murderer. And for a while the three older teenage boys life was over because they were in prison. Personally, I believe that when you're in prison your life is done, mainly because you don't have freedom anymore. And even when you do get out of jail sometimes you can't adapt to society because times have changed so much. Also you have a record and depending on the severity of your crime you may never hold a job again. Nobody wants to hire a criminal, so what kind of Life are you supposed to live if you can't support yourself because you can't get a job? My answer to this question is... not a very comfortable one. It may be just me but I don't think that the Memphis Three killed the little boys. I was on YouTube the other day looking at Paradise Lost and viewing some of the comments. Some people were saying that they just know for a fact that the Memphis Three were the ones that killed the little boys. But im thinking that nobody knows who killed the little boys except for the little boys and the murderer. So what gives the people on the Internet the right to say such things when they truly don't know for a fact if the Memphis Three are the murderers. I kind of feel like this bringing down the boys (Memphis Three) names even more then they already have been brought down. I'm a really sympathetic person, so I always assume that people are innocent until there's a significant amount of evidence proving that they're guilty. And the evidence has to be real; it can't be hypothetical. Your hardcore evidence can't be made up of the answers you got from the accused after questioning them for about 12 hours. Anybody would crack, as in admit to a crime even if they did not commit it, if they endured over a five hours of questioning. I felt bad for the teen's girlfriend ( I can't quite remember which of the Memphis Three's girlfriend she was) because she had a baby. Can you imagine being that baby growing up knowing that your father is in jail accused of the heinous crime of killing and dismembering 3 young boys. Can you imagine waking up everyday knowing that some people only see you as the child of a Murder. I have a feeling that child didn't have a very happy childhood. I say this because the spirit of the town was very "eye for an eye" like you stated. I mean that scene where they were shooting the pumpkin pretending it was one of the Memphis three's head. If they had the chance they would have killed one of the Memphis Three and I wouldn't put it past some of the townspeople that were really angry to wish harm toward Memphis Three's child. Honestly this whole situation is quite disgusting. It's disgusting because three little boy's lives were horribly taken, the adults in town wanted to kill the teenagers (personally i'm against the death penalty), and the fact that this was supposed to be a Christian town and these people are supposed to be Christians. Disgusting, Christians wanting to kill the teen boys; it was sickening. That's not how you're supposed to live. Your supposed to forgive and turn the other cheek. I know times get tough and things don't always go our way and sometimes we get mad but the one thing we can't do is treat someone any way other than the way we want to be treated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your point about the so-called "Christian" town is spot on--and a contributing factor in my whole point about how this made the South's reputation in the national conscience: the cradle of an overzealous, fundamentalist religion and its wacko followers. They might also keep in mind that whole bit about "Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord: I shall repay."

      Delete
  4. The sheer incompetence of the original investigation and trial is astounding. Who doesn’t make any record of an interrogation for almost three hours? What jury convicts after hearing that nearly three hours of interrogation wasn’t recorded? Who puts an expert witness on the stand that bought their Ph.D. in Satanist studies from a mail order class? Who considers a Ph.D. in Satanist studies to be an expert witness? No thought was spared towards finding anyone else who could have killed the boys. There doesn’t seem to have been any investigation in any other directions at all. Echols, Misskelley and Baldwin were charged based solely on allegations of devil worship, but there wasn’t actually anything at the crime scene that pointed towards any sort of devil worship. The reasoning seems to have been dead children equals devil equals who looks like a Satanist. Which isn’t actually grounds for investigation not to mention charging and convicting anyone of a crime. The coverage of the trial makes everyone from this area look ignorant, as if devil worshippers would actually go around killing children. I remember reading Agatha Christie’s autobiography in which she recounts visiting a Satanist chapel and she says something to the effect of it being one of the calmest and peaceful places she’d ever visited while many aspects of the Christian religion are exactly the opposite (Spanish Inquisition anyone?). None of that is the point though, the point is that three small boys were murdered and nobody seems particularly bothered. The celebrities who involved themselves in the case didn’t care, they were worried about the wrongly convicted boys. The wrongly convicted boys don’t even seem to care, if I had just spent years in prison for a crime I didn’t commit I would want to know who did commit the crime and I would want them in prison. I find their lack of concern almost as annoying as Echols behavior in the trial.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you and I are on the same page about this whole issue. The reason I bring it up at all is that it is a travesty from start to finish had it happened anywhere, but the fact that it happened in West Memphis just drives home the idea that the South is still stuck in a perpetual timewarp that resembles the average 17th century New England witch hunt. The hastiness of the investigation, the flimsiness of the so-called 'evidence' and the pathetic 'expert witness' leaves me very frustrated--and, like I say, meanwhile three little boys were murdered in cold blood.

      Delete
  5. This documentary was really shocking to me. I had heard before of this case here and there in passing but I never really knew the gory details. It is really strange to think something this gruesome happened so close to home. I really want to know who truly committed the crime. I am kind of on the fence on whether I think they actually did it or not. On one hand there were a lot of inconsistencies with the interrogations and trials. Though, on the other hand, the attitudes of the three boys were almost like they did not even care at all. At times the evidence itself was sort of hard to deny as well. Damien was a weird and semi dark person. It would not be hard, honestly, to imagine him committing the murders. The other two boys, I felt like, were not very intelligent and would have easily just gone along with anything he said if they did really do it. Still, it is really difficult for me to believe that these three boys were capable of pulling off a crime to this degree. Even the evidence that they found against them was not really enough, to me, to completely prove without a doubt that they were guilty. Like I said I am on the fence on what I believe, but I do think that they were scapegoats either way. There was so much pressure on the investigators to solve the case. At that point I feel like they would have settled for any conclusion as long as they had someone to blame in the public’s eye. Whether they really committed the crime or not, they were a way to calm the public’s panic. Its breaks my heart that something so terrible happened to such young and innocent little boys. In the midst of all the panic, its like the real tragedy of what happened to them happened was lost.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you wholeheartedly about what you say concerning the three little boys--and that is the very glaring fact that appalls me to this day: that so much media weight was placed on Damien's innocence by all concerned that the fact of the real killer is just water under the bridge. It's such a desecration to their little lives.

      Delete
  6. What happened to Stevie Branch, Michael Moore, and Chris Beyers was horrific, despicable and tragic. I can only imagine the devastation of the families and citizens of Crittenden County, Arkansas as they watched these events rip through their area. My heart breaks for these three little boys; what happened to them is something that no one should ever have to go through. Their innocence was lost, and their lives were taken. Having watched the documentary two weeks ago, I thought that my heart would have moved on from them. But my heart is still breaking over what happened, even though it was 23 years ago. Those boys should have their own eight year old boys right now. Those boys should have college degrees. Those boys should have beautiful wives that provide a safe haven from the hardships in the workforce. Those boys should be teaching their sons how to fly a kite, how to fish, as well as leading in example of how to treat the women in their life. Those boys had so much potential, they had their whole life ahead of them. But in a matter of hours, everything was lost. I can only imagine what the Arkansas judges and jurors had to sit through. If watching a two hour documentary was hard for me, I do not care to know the grueling process of the trials for the three perpetrators who ended three precious lives. We, the audience, were not privy to all the evidence and testimonies that the judges and jurors were provided with. The world was a completely different world 23 years ago. There were not as many rules and regulations for how things were operated in the work place. I do not think that people should debate on who killed them as much as they should honor the three victims. Instead of debating whether or not the judge and jurors made the right decision the conviction of the three teenagers, we should focus on keeping the hopes and dreams alive of those who could not fend for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I cannot believe that I never heard about these murders up until I saw the videos. Most would think since I’m a forensic major, I would at least knew about this. This was my first time ever hearing. It is good to know that they are out of prison living normal lives. Even though they did kill three children, they are still human beings. The videos I thought presented the case very well. I liked how it gave equal argument for both sides. I was disappointed that they did not get the jury opinion on how they came to their verdict. I would have been great to see how a group of individuals with different backgrounds put together the evidence they were given to come up with a conclusion. After watching the video, I was wondering on how the case would have turned out if this would have happen today. If anything, it would have been a different case because compare from the 1990s to 2016, we have better technology and more knowledge than we did back then. There probably would been more evidence and better opinions that would have proven the boys guilty or not. I am kind on the middle when it comes to them actually murdering the children or not. Even if they did not murder them, all three of them were convicted for it. They are stuck we this on their record for the rest of their lives.

    ReplyDelete